I can't say whether or not Serif would go for this, but this should be feasible as most of the underlying technology is already there in the form of linked images as are now supported for Publisher. afphoto files for raw editing would act similarly to a sidecar file and hopefully occupy next to no memory. afphoto file with a linked photo and Developer Persona settings unbaked. Successful software concentrates on what it can do well and tries to do it even better.Īt the very least it would be great to save a. Just forget it and focus on the retouching features that could be enhanced or added to AP. ![]() So, my opinion is that a version of Affinity Photo without any RAW processing would be certainly welcome. Photographers need a tool that allows them to accomplish the retouching tasks that are not possible in their RAW development software, just because it's something totally different. The question is : why are so many photographers interested in Affinity Photo ? Because they need a tool that is easier to use than Photoshop, that can do enough to handle most retouching tasks and that does not force them to enter the subscription marketing model. Lightroom/Camera RAW, DxO Photolab, Capture One are dominating the RAW Development software market and Serif will have a hard time catching up. ![]() ![]() Considering how advanced are the RAW processing software nowadays and considering that Serif currently have no idea about how they will implement a non-destructive RAW development in the future (see above) and also that they are probably using an external RAW engine like DCRaw or LibRaw, I'd say that I neither expect nor need or wish this feature. Well, I think I'll go against the tide about this idea.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |